Subject:
|
Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 26 Feb 1999 08:44:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1124 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 26 Feb 1999 08:14:33 GMT, lehman@javanet.com (Todd Lehman) wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, legoverse@geocities.com (Terry K) writes:
> > We are facing a major problem in numbering parts in LDraw. For quite some time
> > I have been trying to follow a 3 rule plan for numbering pieces:
> > [...]
> > The problem is, that some elements would force us to use numbers in seemingly
> > un-intuitive ways. An example:
> > [...]
> > Some more problems from the current vote: (from Joshua Delahunty)
> > [...]
> > What to do?
> > We need to resolve this as a group decision.
>
> I am *SOOO* happy that Terry and Joshua (and others) are anal-retentive enough
> and pedantic enough -- and thorough enough -- to bring this sort of thing up.
> Just imagine what a mess it would all be if nobody cared...
>
> This is really cool, guys!
>
> --Todd
Well, to be honest, I just want to get a firm consensus on the best way to
number these things. Something that will (hopefully) be agreable to the
majority of users. Something I can use without greying too many more hairs.
The real problem is how to balance LDraw between two uses; recreational
modeling vs. part archiving. Can we please both camps?
-- Terry K --
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| (...) I am *SOOO* happy that Terry and Joshua (and others) are anal-retentive enough and pedantic enough -- and thorough enough -- to bring this sort of thing up. Just imagine what a mess it would all be if nobody cared... This is really cool, guys! (...) (25 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
66 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
