Subject:
|
Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 1 Mar 1999 15:18:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1540 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sat, 27 Feb 1999 16:49:12 GMT, jasper@janssen.dynip.com (Jasper
Janssen) wrote:
> Is it not possible to say in the definition of 410etc., like:
>
> top half yellow,
> lower half yellow underneath.
>
> That way, the only information in the 410etc file is the color, and
> which constituents parts there are. Then if anything needs to changed,
> you can change in the 30xxxx part.
That's not much better, because a new part-file is still required
whenever a new color is released.
Steve "I should probably keep these responses in the outbox until after
I've read all 60 incoming messages" Bliss
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| (...) Why's that such a big problem? I mean... it's not like a 20 byte part file, or 10000 of them, will take up a significant amount of space. Especially zipped, when you don't have to worry about cluster sizes. By the time there are so many (...) (25 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| (...) Is it not possible to say in the definition of 410etc., like: top half yellow, lower half yellow underneath. That way, the only information in the 410etc file is the color, and which constituents parts there are. Then if anything needs to (...) (25 years ago, 27-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
66 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
