To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 348
347  |  349
Subject: 
Re: DAT voting page up
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Fri, 26 Feb 1999 07:28:15 GMT
Viewed: 
2687 times
  
Terry K wrote:

On Thu, 25 Feb 1999 05:35:47 GMT, "jonathan wilson" <wilsonj@xoommail.com>

also regarding the details noone has modeled the small imprinted lego logo on
parts

Perhaps because it would be too small to resolve clearly when rendering - and
would add greatly to rendering times.


Yes, at the resolution of LDRAW, the logo would show up as stray pixels of high
contrast, and not look good at all.  But in photographs/rendering, having those
logos makes all the difference in the world.  It's IMHO the reason MegaBlocks
always look worse than LEGO.

If one wanted the logo to appear in LDLite, the best solution would be
beveled letters, formed from slanted
polygons above the top of the stud, since they would catch the light
at a different angle, and create only a small change in the shading.

-gyug



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: DAT voting page up
 
(...) Would using the curved primitives work well or badly (since they are just angled polygons)? Steve (26 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: DAT voting page up
 
(...) Perhaps because it would be too small to resolve clearly when rendering - and would add greatly to rendering times. -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

42 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR