To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 376
375  |  377
Subject: 
Re: Modeling without the real element -- bad
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Fri, 26 Feb 1999 16:29:05 GMT
Viewed: 
2643 times
  
On Thu, 25 Feb 1999 23:24:19 GMT, "jonathan wilson"
<wilsonj@xoommail.com> wrote:

regarding my raised baselpate it is now (in the version i sent to terry last
night) it is now mabie only 3-4ldu out maxumum ,if that, the fix adds a stud
along the bottom of the piece next to the ramp (i discovered that there was one
missing)

also the little 4 x 4 stud areas have been moved out 1 stud area because i
discovered that the tlg part was wrong.

How could the TLG part be wrong?  I'm not understanding this...

the only thing left to do wiuld be to model the underside but that would
probobly take as much time as the top part did and anyway no-one would really
bother looking from beneath i.e. it is the perfect use of the needs work tag

No, it isn't a good use of 'needs work'.  You are talking about skipping
half of the surface area.

also to the people complaining about my magnifying glass part etc how about
just adding the needs work tag and fixing them at a later date.

No, it's not appropriate to use 'needs work' for this part.

also regarding the archery target tlk to steve bliss because he fixed my part.

Very good example of why not to author part-files without having the
part -- I don't have this part, I never even knew it existed.  I worked
from the part file, replacing the rasterized pattern with
primitive-based patterns.  Apparently, the detail in the raster wasn't
sufficient for the purpose.

Steve



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Modeling without the real element -- bad
 
(...) my part dod not match the tlg part. (typo) (26 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Modeling without the real element -- bad
 
regarding my raised baselpate it is now (in the version i sent to terry last night) it is now mabie only 3-4ldu out maxumum ,if that, the fix adds a stud along the bottom of the piece next to the ramp (i discovered that there was one missing) also (...) (26 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

42 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR