To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 376
375  |  377
Subject: 
Re: Modeling without the real element -- bad
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Fri, 26 Feb 1999 16:29:05 GMT
Viewed: 
4769 times
  
On Thu, 25 Feb 1999 23:24:19 GMT, "jonathan wilson"
<wilsonj@xoommail.com> wrote:

> regarding my raised baselpate it is now (in the version i sent to terry last
> night) it is now mabie only 3-4ldu out maxumum ,if that, the fix adds a stud
> along the bottom of the piece next to the ramp (i discovered that there was one
> missing)
> 
> also the little 4 x 4 stud areas have been moved out 1 stud area because i
> discovered that the tlg part was wrong.

How could the TLG part be wrong?  I'm not understanding this...

> the only thing left to do wiuld be to model the underside but that would
> probobly take as much time as the top part did and anyway no-one would really
> bother looking from beneath i.e. it is the perfect use of the needs work tag

No, it isn't a good use of 'needs work'.  You are talking about skipping
half of the surface area.

> also to the people complaining about my magnifying glass part etc how about
> just adding the needs work tag and fixing them at a later date.

No, it's not appropriate to use 'needs work' for this part.

> also regarding the archery target tlk to steve bliss because he fixed my part.

Very good example of why not to author part-files without having the
part -- I don't have this part, I never even knew it existed.  I worked
from the part file, replacing the rasterized pattern with
primitive-based patterns.  Apparently, the detail in the raster wasn't
sufficient for the purpose.

Steve



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Modeling without the real element -- bad
 
(...) my part dod not match the tlg part. (typo) (28 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Modeling without the real element -- bad
 
regarding my raised baselpate it is now (in the version i sent to terry last night) it is now mabie only 3-4ldu out maxumum ,if that, the fix adds a stud along the bottom of the piece next to the ramp (i discovered that there was one missing) also (...) (28 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

42 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR