Subject:
|
Re: Modeling without the real element -- bad
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 25 Feb 1999 22:31:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2152 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote
> Indeed.
>
> In fact -- and maybe I'm reading too much into this -- but I'm surprised • that
> there isn't a strict rule against submitting parts that have been modeled
> without having them in front of you. (Mock-ups noted as such being a valid
> exception, right?)
>
> Terry: Is that correct? Is there not currently a rule against submitting
> parts that have not been painstakingly measured from a real element?
>
> I think you should flat-out reject all parts submitted by people who • haven't
> measured the dimensions and haven't worked from an actual element. It's • just
> wrong to model them without the real element in front of you.
Any station this net ... any staion this net ... is this thing working? Can
anybody hear me? Darn thing must be on the blink again. Any station this
net this Romeo Oscar Yankee. I say again Romeo Oscar Yankee, I am sending
blind and in the clear, message is the following....Victor Oscar Tango Echo
... I say again, Victor Oscar Tango Echo ... over and out.
> If Jonathan has the energy to model parts, but not the will to purchase • them,
> then perhaps we can send Jonathan parts via snail mail. IMHO, no one • should
> be working blind
Great idea! Whatcha gonna send 'im first thare pard?
Roy
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Modeling without the real element -- bad
|
| (...) Indeed. In fact -- and maybe I'm reading too much into this -- but I'm surprised that there isn't a strict rule against submitting parts that have been modeled without having them in front of you. (Mock-ups noted as such being a valid (...) (26 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
