Special:
|
[DAT] (requires LDraw-compatible viewer)
|
Subject:
|
Re: DAT voting page up
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 26 Feb 1999 16:23:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2317 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 26 Feb 1999 00:22:55 GMT, Bram Lambrecht <braml@juno.com> wrote:
> If you added the numbers on the bottom of the pieces (which even appear
> in different sizes and different spots on the piece depending on the age)
> you would have to model the indentation under each "solid" stud too. Can
> you imagine trying to create a plane full of holes (ie, the top surface
> of the piece. Each hole would then be covered by a stud.) You would
> need to make two such planes for each part _and_ put cylinders between
> the planes.
Hmm. We'd just make a new primitive, including the stud, the indent
beneath the stud, and the ndis's around them (maybe the entire 10x10LDU
surface).
1 16 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4-4edge.dat
1 16 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4-4edge.dat
1 16 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4-4edge.dat
1 16 0 -4 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4-4edge.dat
1 10 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 4-4cyli.dat
1 11 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4-4disc.dat
1 12 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 6 4-4cyli.dat
1 13 0 -4 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4-4disc.dat
1 14 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4-4ndis.dat
1 14 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4-4ndis.dat
> Needless to say, I think it's best if we stick to the standard that if
> it's shown in official TLG instructions, we model it, if not, we don't.
Right. I'm not saying the above is a good idea, either. I'm just
playing.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: DAT voting page up
|
| (...) the (...) much (...) If you added the numbers on the bottom of the pieces (which even appear in different sizes and different spots on the piece depending on the age) you would have to model the indentation under each "solid" stud too. Can you (...) (25 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
