To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 282
281  |  283
Subject: 
Re: DAT voting page up
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Thu, 25 Feb 1999 04:37:49 GMT
Viewed: 
2225 times
  
Terry K wrote in message <36d4980d.635296@lugnet.com>...

How do you expect to be able to accurately model pieces into LDraw if you • don't
have them?
I can understand maybe real simple pieces, but some of the pieces you have
attempted have been of complex forms.  I find it difficult to believe that • you
could do a credible job of recreating a complex piece in LDraw without • having
the actual piece to guide you.

Geez, Terry, its all relative.  I've yet to see anyone try to model the few
imprinted part numbers there are.  Besides, if we start getting too picky
we'll be wanting the lot numbers next 8-o.


This makes me seriously question the accuracy of all the parts you have
submitted.

That's what the vote is all about.  So he doesn't have any LEGO pieces.
That will be the next step.  Lego is like a cold; once your exposed you
can't help but catch it.  ;-}

Roy



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: DAT voting page up
 
(...) i had lego when i was young but i do not have any internions to buy lego any time soon because if i got back into it it would cost a fortune. also regarding the details noone has modeled the small imprinted lego logo on parts (26 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
  Re: DAT voting page up
 
(...) I am not worried about part numbers on the parts. What I am concerned about is the overall accuracy of a part that is modelled from a picture. If you have followed l-cad for any time at all, you recall much discussion about part dimensions. (...) (26 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
  Re: DAT voting page up
 
(...) You know, these wouldn't be so hard to do... I've already made files with line-drawings of all the numerals. Just need a hyphen, and (I think) an L and R, and we're good to go. Steve (26 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: DAT voting page up
 
(...) !! Really? How do you expect to be able to accurately model pieces into LDraw if you don't have them? I can understand maybe real simple pieces, but some of the pieces you have attempted have been of complex forms. I find it difficult to (...) (26 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

42 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR