Subject:
|
Re: DAT voting page up
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 25 Feb 1999 06:56:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2509 times
|
| |
|
|
On Thu, 25 Feb 1999 05:35:47 GMT, "jonathan wilson" <wilsonj@xoommail.com>
wrote:
> > That's what the vote is all about. So he doesn't have any LEGO pieces.
> > That will be the next step. Lego is like a cold; once your exposed you
> > can't help but catch it. ;-}
> i had lego when i was young but i do not have any internions to buy lego any
> time soon because if i got back into it it would cost a fortune.
>
> also regarding the details noone has modeled the small imprinted lego logo on
> parts
Perhaps because it would be too small to resolve clearly when rendering - and
would add greatly to rendering times.
-- Terry K --
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: DAT voting page up
|
| (...) Yes, at the resolution of LDRAW, the logo would show up as stray pixels of high contrast, and not look good at all. But in photographs/rendering, having those logos makes all the difference in the world. It's IMHO the reason MegaBlocks always (...) (26 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
| (...) i had lego when i was young but i do not have any internions to buy lego any time soon because if i got back into it it would cost a fortune. also regarding the details noone has modeled the small imprinted lego logo on parts (26 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
