Subject:
|
Re: DAT voting page up
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 25 Feb 1999 16:28:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1777 times
|
| |
|
|
On Thu, 25 Feb 1999 04:37:49 GMT, "Earls HouseHold"
<brandone@mounet.com> wrote:
> ... I've yet to see anyone try to model the few
> imprinted part numbers there are. Besides, if we start getting too picky
> we'll be wanting the lot numbers next 8-o.
You know, these wouldn't be so hard to do...
I've already made files with line-drawings of all the numerals. Just
need a hyphen, and (I think) an L and R, and we're good to go.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: DAT voting page up
|
| Steve Bliss wrote in message <36d579c3.1627208@lu...et.com>... (...) The point here would be that line drawings would not be accurate since the part numbers I've seen are raised and moulded as are the lot numbers and some even have copyrights (...) (25 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
| Terry K wrote in message <36d4980d.635296@lugnet.com>... (...) don't (...) you (...) having (...) Geez, Terry, its all relative. I've yet to see anyone try to model the few imprinted part numbers there are. Besides, if we start getting too picky (...) (25 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
