Subject:
|
Re: Modeling without the real element -- bad
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 25 Feb 1999 23:24:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2533 times
|
| |
|
|
regarding my raised baselpate it is now (in the version i sent to terry last
night) it is now mabie only 3-4ldu out maxumum ,if that, the fix adds a stud
along the bottom of the piece next to the ramp (i discovered that there was one
missing)
also the little 4 x 4 stud areas have been moved out 1 stud area because i
discovered that the tlg part was wrong.
the only thing left to do wiuld be to model the underside but that would
probobly take as much time as the top part did and anyway no-one would really
bother looking from beneath i.e. it is the perfect use of the needs work tag
also to the people complaining about my magnifying glass part etc how about
just adding the needs work tag and fixing them at a later date.
also regarding the archery target tlk to steve bliss because he fixed my part.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Modeling without the real element -- bad
|
| (...) How could the TLG part be wrong? I'm not understanding this... (...) No, it isn't a good use of 'needs work'. You are talking about skipping half of the surface area. (...) No, it's not appropriate to use 'needs work' for this part. (...) Very (...) (26 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Modeling without the real element -- bad
|
| Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) that (...) haven't (...) just (...) them, (...) should (...) There are some exceptions to an otherwise good rule. For example, the new Technic Link which appears on the Y-wing. If I find out from someone how (...) (26 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
