Subject:
|
Re: DAT voting page up
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 25 Feb 1999 22:20:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2084 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote in message <36d5afa3.15421162@lugnet.com>...
> It's not *that* hard to go from the line drawings to raised forms.
> Especially since each numeral only needs to be done once.
Okay, I see that I was shooting for a kill and all I got was a dent. My
point was to be made by what I'm calling the lot number, it may be the
position number of the part on the sprue and mould number, who knows. The
point is that number changes from part to part which would mean you have to
model all the different variations, which is; in soto voice, to much work
for anyone and begs the question, do we really want to get that technical?
Roy
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: DAT voting page up
|
| (...) the (...) much (...) If you added the numbers on the bottom of the pieces (which even appear in different sizes and different spots on the piece depending on the age) you would have to model the indentation under each "solid" stud too. Can you (...) (25 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
| (...) It's not *that* hard to go from the line drawings to raised forms. Especially since each numeral only needs to be done once. That LEGO logo and copyright notice, now. Those are a whole different level of challenge. Steve (25 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
