Subject:
|
Re: DAT voting page up
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 26 Feb 1999 16:16:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2707 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 26 Feb 1999 07:28:15 GMT, Paul Gyugyi <paul@gyugyi.com> wrote:
> Terry K wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 25 Feb 1999 05:35:47 GMT, "jonathan wilson" <wilsonj@xoommail.com>
> >
> > > also regarding the details noone has modeled the small imprinted lego logo on
> > > parts
> >
> > Perhaps because it would be too small to resolve clearly when rendering - and
> > would add greatly to rendering times.
>
>
> Yes, at the resolution of LDRAW, the logo would show up as stray pixels of high
> contrast, and not look good at all. But in photographs/rendering, having those
> logos makes all the difference in the world. It's IMHO the reason MegaBlocks
> always look worse than LEGO.
>
> If one wanted the logo to appear in LDLite, the best solution would be
> beveled letters, formed from slanted
> polygons above the top of the stud, since they would catch the light
> at a different angle, and create only a small change in the shading.
Would using the curved primitives work well or badly (since they are
just angled polygons)?
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: DAT voting page up
|
| (...) Yes, at the resolution of LDRAW, the logo would show up as stray pixels of high contrast, and not look good at all. But in photographs/rendering, having those logos makes all the difference in the world. It's IMHO the reason MegaBlocks always (...) (26 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
