Subject:
|
Re: DAT voting page up
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 25 Feb 1999 00:29:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1471 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, 24 Feb 1999 10:06:15 GMT, "jonathan wilson" <wilsonj@xoommail.com>
wrote:
> i do not accually own any lego.
> i am excusivly ldraw.
!! Really?
How do you expect to be able to accurately model pieces into LDraw if you don't
have them?
I can understand maybe real simple pieces, but some of the pieces you have
attempted have been of complex forms. I find it difficult to believe that you
could do a credible job of recreating a complex piece in LDraw without having
the actual piece to guide you.
This makes me seriously question the accuracy of all the parts you have
submitted.
-- Terry K --
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: DAT voting page up
|
| (...) don't (...) i have been using the instructions from kl.net, catalog pictures and pause magazime set guide as ny main source of information. they seem to work. for examlpe take my raised baseplate. it is now completely fixed. i have build kings (...) (25 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | Re: DAT voting page up
|
| Terry K wrote in message <36d4980d.635296@lugnet.com>... (...) don't (...) you (...) having (...) Geez, Terry, its all relative. I've yet to see anyone try to model the few imprinted part numbers there are. Besides, if we start getting too picky (...) (25 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | Modeling without the real element -- bad
|
| (...) Indeed. In fact -- and maybe I'm reading too much into this -- but I'm surprised that there isn't a strict rule against submitting parts that have been modeled without having them in front of you. (Mock-ups noted as such being a valid (...) (25 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
