Subject:
|
Re: Modeling without the real element -- bad
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 26 Feb 1999 11:56:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2455 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no (Fredrik Glöckner) writes:
> [...]
> Now, if we were to reject all these parts with errors in them, using
> LDRaw would be no fun at all.
> [...]
Why wouldn't rejecting flawed parts improve the quality of the parts? It's
not like they'd never get in -- they'd just get fixed right away.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Modeling without the real element -- bad
|
| (...) Sure, but it's not like the modelers are payed to make the parts. Personally, my motivation for making a new part is the enjoyment I feel from being able to use it in a model. But, to take the part 32140.DAT as an example agian, this (...) (25 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Modeling without the real element -- bad
|
| (...) I'm sure this happens all the time. A lot of the current LDraw elements are wrong, in some way. Some examples, from the top of my head: - The teeth of the Technic gear cogs are too wide. In real life, the width is 10 LDU, but on the LDraw cogs (...) (25 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
