Subject:
|
Re: DAT voting page up
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 25 Feb 1999 20:17:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1964 times
|
| |
|
|
On Thu, 25 Feb 1999 18:05:36 GMT, "Earls HouseHold"
<brandone@mounet.com> wrote:
> Steve Bliss wrote in message <36d579c3.1627208@lugnet.com>...
> > On Thu, 25 Feb 1999 04:37:49 GMT, "Earls HouseHold"
> > <brandone@mounet.com> wrote:
> > You know, these wouldn't be so hard to do...
> >
> > I've already made files with line-drawings of all the numerals. Just
> > need a hyphen, and (I think) an L and R, and we're good to go.
>
>
> The point here would be that line drawings would not be accurate since the
> part numbers I've seen are raised and moulded as are the lot numbers and
> some even have copyrights moulded.
It's not *that* hard to go from the line drawings to raised forms.
Especially since each numeral only needs to be done once.
That LEGO logo and copyright notice, now. Those are a whole different
level of challenge.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: DAT voting page up
|
| Steve Bliss wrote in message <36d5afa3.15421162@l...et.com>... (...) Okay, I see that I was shooting for a kill and all I got was a dent. My point was to be made by what I'm calling the lot number, it may be the position number of the part on the (...) (25 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
| Steve Bliss wrote in message <36d579c3.1627208@lu...et.com>... (...) The point here would be that line drawings would not be accurate since the part numbers I've seen are raised and moulded as are the lot numbers and some even have copyrights (...) (25 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
