Subject:
|
Re: Modeling without the real element -- bad
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 25 Feb 1999 23:36:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1830 times
|
| |
|
|
people are saying that some of the parts i have made are very complex.
which ones are being refered to?
i deliberatly attempted simple parts like the magnifying glass, signal holder
(i pulled the face from the metal detector) etc.
i attempted the raised baseplate because i wanted to do ice station odyssey and
others and i figured that there would be enough information on the instructions
for sets that used the baseplate to interpolate the dimentions.
the baseplate has the needs work tag for 2 reasons. the studs in the pit: some
need to be removed but i do not know which ones. perhaps someone with the part
can help?
also the underside should be hollow.
the part is currently in a usable state. if i wanted a mock-up i would not have
spent a couple of hours making the part, i would have made a fake element from
bricks,slopes etc.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Modeling without the real element -- bad
|
| (...) Some of the parts you sent me were representations of parts that are complex in real life. Complex meaning that they have fine details that _should_ be modeled. (...) And even those "simple" parts are deficient. The magnifying glass is a good (...) (25 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Modeling without the real element -- bad
|
| (...) Indeed. In fact -- and maybe I'm reading too much into this -- but I'm surprised that there isn't a strict rule against submitting parts that have been modeled without having them in front of you. (Mock-ups noted as such being a valid (...) (25 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
