Subject:
|
Re: Cats and pigeons...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 Dec 1999 17:03:38 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
JSPROAT@IO.antispamCOM
|
Viewed:
|
661 times
|
| |
|
|
First off, I just want to say that I can see my previous attitude in a
different light. I trust that the parties involved understand that there is
no need to flame me via e-mail.
Having said that, after seeing how quickly the situation on lego.com resolved
itself, I no longer feel that Remy's posting privs should be yanked; in fact I
feel somewhat responsible that they were revoked after I tried to convince
Todd to do so.
However, the reasons I felt the way I did still stand. LUGNET as a community
is in a potentially fragile situation with the Lego Company, and should avoid
actions which might legitimately bring in the lawyers. I also disagree with
the publicly accessable == public domain argument. (Take it into
.off-topic.debate or e-mail if you want to discuss that; please keep the
flames in .off-topic.debate .)
I can understand the need to keep a cooler head, and I hope that I can be more
analytical in the future. But, given the same set of circummstances -- and
hot attitudes bouncing back and forth -- I would probably make the same choice
again.
Remy, I'm glad Todd reinstated your privs, and I hope that there are no hard
feelings.
Cheers,
- jsproat
--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@io.com> ~~~ http://www.io.com/~jsproat/
"Hello. My name is Jeremy, and I'm a...a brick chewer."
(in unison) "Hi, Jeremy."
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Cats and pigeons...
|
| (...) I don't think anyone is saying that "publicly accessible = public domain". What we're saying is: "made publicly accessible on a web site = made publicly accessible", which seems pretty clear to me. Putting something on a web site certainly (...) (25 years ago, 13-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Cats and pigeons...
|
| (...) The first thing you can do, instead of bouncing the server, is to bump off the folks who *flagrantly* flout your request to not post sensitive TLC info. Specifically, *this* info. Personally, I'd yank Remy's posting privs immediately. I'm not (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
86 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
