Subject:
|
Re: Cats and pigeons...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 10 Dec 1999 23:24:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4912 times
|
| |
|
|
Oh now I have seen it ALL. TRADE SECRETS?!? That's it, you people are so
hopelessly uptight, I may leave this group and go back to RTL!!! I'd rather have
anarchy than self-righteousness!
THEY ARE LINKS TO PICS ON THE F$&()%$ LEGO.COM SITE! If they wanted them
protected, they DAMNED well should have put them on a staging server like any
decent company does!
I found those URLs myself - like it's really hard to do! I'd post how pitifully
easy it was to find them, but I'd evidently be banned for it.
You people are truly making me sick. I am sitting here shaking with RAGE over how
ANAL this is getting!
Sproaticus wrote:
> Todd Lehman wrote:
> > In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > I'm not following you at this point. Were you seriously contemplating
> > > shutting down all of LUGNET because someone posted a URL to some images
> > > on the lego.com site? Images that are out in public view? Images
> > > therefore covered under the fairplay policy?
> > I'm looking for a solution (even an imperfect one) to an extremely complex
> > problem which I'm afraid doesn't exist (the solution, that is).
>
> The first thing you can do, instead of bouncing the server, is to bump off the
> folks who *flagrantly* flout your request to not post sensitive TLC info.
> Specifically, *this* info. Personally, I'd yank Remy's posting privs
> immediately.
>
> I'm not talking about stifling free speech here, just some basic CYA. If
> someone wants to disseminate Lego trade secrets, they can use someone else's
> server.
>
> Cheers,
> - jsproat
>
> --
> Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@io.com> ~~~ http://www.io.com/~jsproat/
> "Hello. My name is Jeremy, and I'm a...a brick chewer."
> (in unison) "Hi, Jeremy."
--
| Tom Stangl, Technical Support Netscape Communications Corp
| Please do not associate my personal views with my employer
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Cats and pigeons...
|
| (...) The first thing you can do, instead of bouncing the server, is to bump off the folks who *flagrantly* flout your request to not post sensitive TLC info. Specifically, *this* info. Personally, I'd yank Remy's posting privs immediately. I'm not (...) (27 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
86 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
