| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
>
> For example, what someone just posted here:
>
> http://www.lugnet.com/general/?n=11804
>
> is very possibly a violation of the LEGO Company's privacy, simply via links,
> if I understand correctly how the URLs were obtained. :-(
>
> --Todd
To clarify things, whilst someone did post a link that went directly to a
picture of an unreleased set, for me at least ALL the sets new were, and still
are on some ISP's(!):-
A. all the new sections can be linked to from appropriate links on the catalog
front page, i.e. there is a button for Knights Kingdom, Lego Baby, etc
B. all the new sets in old and new sections are clearly listed in the drop
down menus
So whilst there may be a way to 'nose around' with that URL, I and others,
judging from the posts could see all the new stuff in the standard catalog
with working links
So, for what may have been a short period, and what may have been a mistake,
it was, and still is in some places, clearly in public view on their public
website without anyone having to be devious
regards
lawrence
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Cats and pigeons...
|
| (...) Actually -- I take that back, partially. There's one thing I hadn't considered: invasive URL pointers into www.lego.com! Ug. For example, what someone just posted here: (URL) very possibly a violation of the LEGO Company's privacy, simply via (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
86 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
