Subject:
|
Re: admin.dev?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 3 Aug 2005 01:43:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5019 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
> Ross Crawford wrote:
>
> > Coders are fine for trying out stuff, and coding the final
> > requirements, but they're not necessarily great at deciding
> > what is needed, or what works best for the users.
>
> I will not claim that what you write is not true (because it probably is), but
> if we're talking voluntary work, you shouldn't expect coders to code things they
> can't see the point with.
>
> It is fine with somebody trying to give orders, but don't expect the orders to
> be followed - at least not because they're orders.
>
> In a voluntary system, the coders decide what is made, and the system
> administrators decide which parts of it is added to the production system. - But
> hopefully (and usually) the coders and the system administrators listen to other
> users of the system.
>
> > However if we can keep that to a simple system
> > design (sans politics), it would be good.
>
> It seems to me that we're not very good at avoiding politics, but lets give it a
> try.
>
> Play well,
>
> Jacob
yeah. To be honest, this sort of stuff should be left to think about after the
change in ownership. I mean, it's great to think and talk anytime - I just mean
that, because there's no urgency, we needen't stress about it right now.
-Suz
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: admin.dev?
|
| (...) I will not claim that what you write is not true (because it probably is), but if we're talking voluntary work, you shouldn't expect coders to code things they can't see the point with. It is fine with somebody trying to give orders, but don't (...) (19 years ago, 2-Aug-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
77 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
