Subject:
|
Re: Dear NNTP users,
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:44:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3938 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Johannes Koehler wrote:
> But I will never understand in which way NNTP can possibly be better for
> discussions about a picture-dependent hobby like LEGO.
Actually, people were having online discussions about LEGO for a long time,
before digital images were so prevalent.
But I think it's a matter of preference -- I don't spend nearly as much of my
'LEGO' time looking at MOCs as other people do. I'm more interested in what
people are discussing, what's going on. But maybe I'm a freak.
And again, NNTP isn't 'text' or 'pictures' -- it's a protocol. There's nothing
inherently wrong[1] with an HTML-enabled NNTP client. It's just not as common
as textual communication.
Steve
1) Other than the inherent evils of HTML security, of course.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Dear NNTP users,
|
| Hello! (...) That's exactly what I never understood about the NNTP fans' fondness of NNTP. I *can* understand why software engineers, coders and other geeky NNTP users (sorry :-) ) use NNTP and actually prefer it over every other form of forum. But (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
77 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
