Subject:
|
Re: Another one of those 'what's wrong with TPM' posts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Thu, 1 Jun 2000 18:34:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
925 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Mike Petrucelli writes:
>
> > Lucas is a visionary, but he doesn't seem to have an eye for subtlety.
>
> Major time disagree with you:
>
> http://www.lugnet.com/starwars/?n=7578
>
> see here for details.
>
> -Lord Insanity
If 20-25+ years ago George Lucas planned to offer his audience modest lightsaber
battles (in ANH & TESB), so that he could wow his future fans (the same fans
that he was sure would in fact be hooked) with a phenomenal lightsaber battles
in his at-the-time unscripted prequels, then I ineed give him credit for his
admirable foresight, patience, and astounding subtelty. I do indeed hope to be
soundly thrashed for my lack of faith when EP2 & EP3 are released, but, our
first new SW movie in 16 years displayed a decided lack of sophistication in
terms of its characterization, plot development, and, yes, eye for detail.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Another one of those 'what's wrong with TPM' posts
|
| (...) I too don't but the "awesome powers of foresight" explanations. I may not think much of Lucas as a writer, but he is one. Part of creativity is re-interpreting your own work. Especially when you have to work yourself out of a plot jam. When (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
94 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
