Subject:
|
Re: Another one of those 'what's wrong with TPM' posts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Thu, 1 Jun 2000 15:45:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
992 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.starwars, Eric Joslin writes:
> In lugnet.starwars, Scott P. Costello writes:
> >
> > > But, you must remember that the ONLY thing that holds water when it comes to
> > > the SW movies is the movies themselves. Books mean nothing, and nothing in
> > > them should be accepted as fact.
> > > -Chris
> >
> > This anti-expanded universe attitude does not hold much water. Every book
> > ever written in the Star Wars universe must first pass through
> > several "continuity editors." These guys work directly for Lucasarts to
> > ensure that no authorized material violates or contradicts any other work.
> > Many, myself included, feel that the comic book series took some liberties,
> > but according to Lucasarts these works are just as much Star Wars cannon as
> > the movies. Consider this fact, the city Coruscant was originally named in
> > Timothy Zahn's first novel, George Lucas liked the idea so much he
> > incorporated it into Episode I.
>
> Err. No? The only things that are canon (one N) besides the movies are the
> Heir to the Empire trilogy and Shadows of the Empire.
>
> eric
Alright to put this whole thing to rest... If you lurk on
alt.startrek.vs.starwars long enough you will be forced to learn this.
Lucasfilm's offical order of canon (in the event of a contradiction the
highest source takes priority) is as follows: Movies, Novels of the Movies,
Epanded Universe Novels, and Comics. Everything else is NOT canon. Things
that are NOT canon include the SW Christmas Special, The Droids Cartoon, The
Ewoks Cartoon, etc.
-Lord Insanity
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
94 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|