To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 2869
2868  |  2870
Subject: 
Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 18 Dec 1999 00:48:01 GMT
Viewed: 
34 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Mike Stanley writes:
Yeah, this whole thought of calling it "snooping" seems ridiculous
to me.
[...]
If you run a site and you put things on it you DON'T want people to
see and they're world-readable, it's _your_ problem, not their's.
This isn't wandering into someone's house because their door was
unlocked, it isn't "snooping" - the best analogy I've seen so far is
Matthew's back window analogy.  If you don't want the stuff seen,
don't leave it out there to be seen.

All right.  You have this artist friend.  She paints things.  She invites
you and fifty other people over for a housewarming party.  Great party,
lots of fun, lots of neat things going on.  She's got a couple of her
latest paintings up on display, even.

Now there's this guy there, he gets kind of sauced, and he wanders into
your friend's studio where she works on new ideas.  He flips on the light,
puts down his drink, and sees a bunch of white sheets covering what
obviously are stretched canvases -- works in progress.  Biting his finger,
he shuts the door to the studio (remaining inside), and lifts each of the
sheets to get a sneak peek at the works in progress.  Turns out they're
actually pretty much completed, and scheduled to be put on exhibit in a
few weeks.  But he sneaks some good hard peeks, and he remembers what he
sees.

Now the next day this guy gets on the Internet and posts detailed
descriptions of what he saw, what your friend the painter painted.  (Let's
say she's sort of famous, so people are interested.)

Now, what's the analysis of that?

1.  Does your friend get angry?

2.  Does she have a right to get angry?

3.  Did anything illegal happen?

4.  Did anything immoral happen?

5.  Was any information unlawfully leaked?

6.  Was privacy invaded?

7.  Were publicity rights infringed?

8.  What would happen in court if your friend tried to sue this guy?

--Todd



Message has 5 Replies:
  Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
 
(...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
 
(...) False analogy. Your conditions don't match Lego's, at least in my estimation. If you stated that the artist's display was on the street, in public, and has the other works uncovered in an inconspicuous but equally public location, then we have (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
 
(...) I don't see how this corresponds. 1. She didn't invite people over specifically to see her paintings, she invited them to housewarming which happened to display a few paintings. On the other hand, the entire purpose of Lego's web site is to (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
 
(...) Aha. Flawed analogy. There were NO SHEETS. It was not only out in the open, it was in the main room of the party. Jasper (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
 
(...) I may revisit this tomorrow after all the spirits are flushed out of my system, but on the surface this is a bogus analogy. Front window/back window. Signs pointing HERE - Look at this! No signs pointing to other areas, but stuff still there (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
 
(...) Yeah, this whole thought of calling it "snooping" seems ridiculous to me. How many times have you had to manually edit URLs you've come across because they just didn't plain work until you "hacked" away at them? If it's world-readable and (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

93 Messages in This Thread:
































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR