Subject:
|
Re: Peace in the Mid-East?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 16:59:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
670 times
|
| |
|
|
> Look at the flip side though. What message did it send when Arafat rejected
> basicly everything he claimed (to "Western Diplomats") to want. Regardless of
> whether it was right for Israelis to elect Sharon, was that not a response to
> Arafat's descision to reject Barak's peace proposal and resume the terror
> attacks?
Even if Arafat had accepted Barak's offer, do you really think the Israeli
public would have? Remember, he still had to put it to a referendum. Barak
was basically gambling.
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Peace in the Mid-East?
|
| (...) Is that your "informed" impartial opinion? It doesn't bother me that Liberals have certain ideas and opinions-- that's their right. It's when they try and pass them off as impartial and unbiased that sends me. You claim to not have taken sides (...) (23 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Peace in the Mid-East?
|
| (...) If only the Palestinians lived in a Democracy and could get rid of him. I think perhaps this is the problem. As I understand it most, if not all, Arab nations are not Democracies. The people in those states know only what their leaders tell (...) (23 years ago, 27-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
93 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
