To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 16360
16359  |  16361
Subject: 
Re: Dave's Anti-American Rant (you've been warned) was Re: Peace in the Mid-East?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 14 May 2002 15:09:36 GMT
Viewed: 
905 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:

How is having publicly funded and run hospitals intruding into my personal
life?  I'm 35 and I have *never* had my life intruded by the medical
profession, the governement, or anyone else that I didn't want to intrude
into my life.  My father (62) and mother (59) never had their lives intruded
upon.  My Opa (lived to be 92) never had his life intruded on.  I don't
understand that point.

Well, as a criticism of public-funded programs, it wasn't a very strong
point, so don't feel bad if you don't understand it.  We've had countless
discussions here about the US Gov't prying into everyone's dirty laundry (or
medical history), and that fear (justified or not) will pervade US
self-perception for a long time to come.

Privatizing everything leads to the 'money talks, everything else walks'
dichotomy.  Those who have the cash are healthy, those that don't have the
cash are unhealthy.  Why would I be considered above my fellow person
because I have more cash than they do?

Be careful of straw man summations like that.  A privatized system doesn't
say "you're wealthy, so you're *better* that that impoverished fellow over
there."  Instead, the privatized system says "I am charging money for
services I provide, and those who are able to pay for those services will
receive them."  There's no implication of "better" or "worse" people
inherent in the privatized system.

Adaptability comes from seeing outside the box, outside the 'small picture'.

"Outside the box" is another phrase that should be tacked onto Godwin's Law.

     Dave!

And if Canada's public systems are so great, why did Neil Peart prattle on
about all that Objectivist silliness?  8^)



Message has 2 Replies:
  Socialised Medicine (was Re: Dave's Anti-American Rant (you've been warned))
 
(...) OK. Can anyone who thinks a public health care system is a bad idea please explain why that argument does not hold for a public education system. To me, and I would guess to most who support these two things, they are both about ensuring (...) (23 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Dave's Anti-American Rant (you've been warned) was Re: Peace in the Mid-East?
 
(...) There might not be an obviously *stated* implication, but an *inherent* implication--"Those that don't have money, don't get" I am charging money for the services I render, and if you cannot afford to pay, you don't get my services. It's *in* (...) (23 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Dave's Anti-American Rant (you've been warned) was Re: Peace in the Mid-East?
 
My post was a rant. In oh so many ways I am thankful that our neighbour to the south is the USofA. I don't think I would be as happy if *any* other country was our closest trading partner, and I will forgive *any* country's transgressions that had (...) (23 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

93 Messages in This Thread:



























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR