Subject:
|
Re: Peace in the Mid-East?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 29 Apr 2002 01:02:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
722 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
>
> > Look at the flip side though. What message did it send when Arafat rejected
> > basicly everything he claimed (to "Western Diplomats") to want. Regardless of
> > whether it was right for Israelis to elect Sharon, was that not a response to
> > Arafat's descision to reject Barak's peace proposal and resume the terror
> > attacks?
>
> Even if Arafat had accepted Barak's offer, do you really think the Israeli
> public would have? Remember, he still had to put it to a referendum. Barak
> was basically gambling.
Is that your "informed" impartial opinion?
It doesn't bother me that Liberals have certain ideas and opinions-- that's
their right. It's when they try and pass them off as impartial and unbiased
that sends me.
You claim to not have taken sides on this issue, but your posts clearly betray
sympathy for the Palestinians and their terrorist representatives, the PLO.
Just be honest about it.
-John
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Peace in the Mid-East?
|
| (...) I am sure Scott can speak for himself, but I can't see why questioning the political motives of either side betrays a leaning for one side or the other. Further, I imagine that Scott is working against the perception that news information in (...) (23 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Peace in the Mid-East?
|
| (...) Even if Arafat had accepted Barak's offer, do you really think the Israeli public would have? Remember, he still had to put it to a referendum. Barak was basically gambling. Scott A (23 years ago, 27-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
93 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
