Subject:
|
Re: Debunk this?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:49:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
772 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > >
> > > > > Do you reject the original UN resolution creating Israel and designating
> > > > > Jordan as the Palestinian homeland? Yes or no, please.
> > > >
> > > > I'm afraid I have never taken the time to read it. I suspect I am not in a
> > > > minority.
> > >
> > > I don't think you have to *read* it to decide if you agree with the general
> > > idea or not, that the UN had the power to decide that Palestine was to be
> > > partitioned, and designated each partition as a homeland for someone.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure I agree with it myself.
> > >
> > > But anyone who cites subsequent UN resolutions in support of their arguments
> > > in this area needs to either accept the initial one or explain why they can
> > > accept some, but not all, UN resolutions on the matter.
> > >
> > > As I said, I don't cite UN resolutions in support of my arguments so I don't
> > > have this problem.
> >
> > What is your point?
>
> What is MY point? My point is that you have no point and you haven't
> answered the question.
You did not pose a question(?). What is your point?
>
> > Are you saying the none of the land Israel is on legally
> > belongs to them. I agree that some of it does not, but I am pretty sure some
> > of it does.
>
> So you agree Israel has a right to exist, then? I suspect (but can't confirm
> since Dan hasn't said) Dan does not feel that way at all.
>
> Myself I go back to the pre Israel settlers, if they bought land legally
> (which is an open question) and were the majority in a region without
> forcibly driving the previous inhabitants out, they ought to be able to
> constitute what government that region has. Or so others say about other areas.
But what about international law? Why not apply the same rule to settlers in
the USA? How fair was the way some them got their land?
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Debunk this?
|
| (...) Really? (...) You didn't answer that question. (...) Still waiting on an answer to that. (...) What about it? (...) We should. (...) It wasn't and it should be undone. Which I have said before. ++Lar (23 years ago, 28-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Debunk this?
|
| (...) What is MY point? My point is that you have no point and you haven't answered the question. (...) So you agree Israel has a right to exist, then? I suspect (but can't confirm since Dan hasn't said) Dan does not feel that way at all. Myself I (...) (23 years ago, 28-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
79 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
