Subject:
|
Re: Debunk this?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 23 Sep 2001 22:09:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
549 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Daniel Jassim writes:
<foam snipped>
Suppose I stipulate for the purposes of discussion that everything you
allege about Israel is true? WILL you answer my questions publicly or not?
Email doesn't count unless I have your permission to republish here.
It's amazing that even when I specifically said: "address what the PA does",
all you can talk about is Israel, or worse, the people you're debating with.
Why is that?
Richard is right, both sides are bad. But you need to answer my question or
you are forever branded as one sided and incapable of even speaking about
this rationally due to bias, as far as I am concerned.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Debunk this?
|
| Here are my answers to Larry's questions regarding the Palestinian Authority. This was previously in an e-mail to him but he was insistant that I respond publicly: (...) I say NO for the simple fact that they regularly condemn terrorist attacks on (...) (23 years ago, 23-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Debunk this?
|
| (...) No, it's been an ongoing thing. And with lot's of variety: assassinations, air raids, rocket attacks, helicopter attacks, cluster bombs, phosphorous bombs, napalm, etc. (...) 100% pure BS and what a way to twist information! Since you admitted (...) (23 years ago, 23-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
79 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
