Subject:
|
Re: Debunk this?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 24 Sep 2001 18:30:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
649 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Daniel Jassim writes:
> Well, how many resolutions/motions to condemn Israel have there been in the
> U.N.?
A lot. Some have passed, and some, as you point out, have been vetoed.
I would ask you though, if you think UN resolutions are something to pick
and choose from, or whether one has to accept them all. If the latter, does
that mean you acknowledge Israel's right to exist (within the original
borders)? That, after all, was a UN resolution as well. It also gave the
Palestinians a homeland, IIRC.
If you reject that particular resolution, you probably ought not to refer to
UN resolutions in support of your arguments at all.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Debunk this?
|
| (...) A few references Israel's changing border: (URL) Vetoes of UN Resolutions Critical of Israel (URL) general assembly resolutions here: (URL) security council resolutions here: (URL) another perspective -- take it or leave it (URL) (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Debunk this?
|
| (...) Because violence begets violence, hates begets hate. The only way to overcome it and live in peace is to not play the game. But how can the Palestinians overcome a bunch of racist, exclusionist thugs like the Zionists especially when they are (...) (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
79 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
