Subject:
|
Re: Debunk this?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 29 Sep 2001 10:26:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
811 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
>
> >
> > You did not pose a question(?).
>
> Really?
>
> > > > > > Do you reject the original UN resolution creating Israel and designating
> > > > > > Jordan as the Palestinian homeland? Yes or no, please.
>
> > What is your point?
>
> You didn't answer that question.
Oh yes I did. (in a pantomime tone)
>
> > >
> > > > Are you saying the none of the land Israel is on legally
> > > > belongs to them. I agree that some of it does not, but I am pretty sure some
> > > > of it does.
> > >
> > > So you agree Israel has a right to exist, then?
>
> Still waiting on an answer to that.
>
> > > I suspect (but can't confirm
> > > since Dan hasn't said) Dan does not feel that way at all.
> > >
> > > Myself I go back to the pre Israel settlers, if they bought land legally
> > > (which is an open question) and were the majority in a region without
> > > forcibly driving the previous inhabitants out, they ought to be able to
> > > constitute what government that region has. Or so others say about other >>areas.
> >
> > But what about international law?
>
> What about it?
>
> > Why not apply the same rule to settlers in
> > the USA?
>
> We should.
>
> > How fair was the way some them got their land?
>
> It wasn't and it should be undone. Which I have said before.
Indeed, and I have said before it would be a great issue for the LP to work on:
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=11386
Scott A
>
> ++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: Debunk this?
|
| (...) I agree that legally Israel does exist and that it is here to stay. I wish they would respect human rights a little more, stop murdering people, respect UN resolutions, hand back what is does not belong top them, get rid of their nuclear (...) (23 years ago, 29-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Debunk this?
|
| (...) Really? (...) You didn't answer that question. (...) Still waiting on an answer to that. (...) What about it? (...) We should. (...) It wasn't and it should be undone. Which I have said before. ++Lar (23 years ago, 28-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
79 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|