| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew Miller writes:
> Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> > pages, then if you go to this index page, it's usually pretty easy from
> > the link colorings to see which images were intended to be viewed and
> > which were hidden through obscurity (no visible links). Granted, anyone
> > who makes this kind of information browseable is either doing it on
> > purpose or is a complete webidiot, but it's still something that I'd
> > (personally) hafta call a form of snooping. YMMV. :-)
>
> You mean you go back and see what you should have felt guilty about, in
> retrospect? I think that's going a bit overboard!
Heh heh. No no, I mean when you find some directory with 755 permissions
(instead of 711 permissions) and it's got no index.html file, but it's got
a home.html file linked to from elsewhere, and home.html contains links to
5 images in its directory, but there are actually 7 images in the directory.
If you look at the other 2 that aren't linked to, then IMHO that's snooping,
unless there's a link somewhere to the directory itself.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
93 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
