Subject:
|
Re: Reply 6: Issues vs. Mistakes
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.color, lugnet.lego
|
Date:
|
Fri, 18 Mar 2005 04:31:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1920 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.color, Christian Treczoks wrote:
| |
Are you really sure that the tan we know is on the list? This is one of
the points I try to get hold of - Jakes posting of the last instace of
the list mentions a “Beige”, which might be our “tan” / Lego’s original
“Brick Yellow, Colour No. 5” (according to the list at peeron), but so
far nobody in that company was in a position to or did indeed confirm
this. That was one of my more important points about communication - Jan
was not in a position to confirm this when I asked him, and Jake did
not answer this question despite several people asking for clarification.
For me, this clarification is important, because I am in the early
planning stages of a MOC where I’d need a few square meters of tan -
nearly all of it in small plates - and I don’t want to run into a
situation like with my last MOC - I was at about 6000 of 20000 pieces of
grey for the model when some smartass decided to scrap this colour...
|
That would indeed be very useful. I was among several people in the
original Universal Color thread
asking for clarification of the list, which to my knowledge, has not yet been
forthcoming.
Marc Nelson Jr.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Reply 6: Issues vs. Mistakes
|
| David Eaton wrote: > Actually, is that true? At the time, was JVK in a position to reverse > the color change? He wasn't the CEO back then. IIRC he was a vice > president of some sort? Was he even in charge of that division of > Lego? I honestly (...) (20 years ago, 17-Mar-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.lego)
|
79 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
