Subject:
|
Re: A new area of LEGO.com: the Build section
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Wed, 9 May 2001 00:43:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
671 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, Tomas Clark writes:
> No, it means that Tomas Clark recognizes that it's an issuefor some
> people and one that is frequently discussed on Lugnet. [...] Please
> resist natural urge to blow minor references out of proportion.
(Smile) OK, when you post using an @lego.com email address and with your
official LEGO title (e.g., Producer, LEGO Direct) in your sig, you are
actually speaking for LEGO; anything you say without a personal disclaimer
is understood to be The Official Word -- straight from the horse's mouth.
Since you did post in an official capacity to an official announcements
newsgroup with no personal disclaimer, I don't think anything was blown out
of proportion, do you? Additionally, my question was a serious question.
If you have opinions that happen to be your own and yours only (i.e., not
the official company line), most places ask their employees to include a
disclaimer of some sort to avoid any possible source of confusion.
So, more to the point, saying "...won't engage in debate about issues like
juniorization" in an official company post is, absent a personal disclaimer,
official acknowledgement from LEGO that juniorization is an issue and
something that LEGO is becoming self-conscious about.
Anyway, thanks for the clarification. (And we'll let you off the hook this
time. :-)
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A new area of LEGO.com: the Build section
|
| (...) It is refreshing to read candid (i.e. not press release) posts from LEGO employees. Try not to make it so painful for them. Who cares if juniorizaion is an "official" issue? Everyone, including LEGO knows what it is, why they did it, who told (...) (23 years ago, 9-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A new area of LEGO.com: the Build section
|
| hanks to everyone for the positive comments! Here are some answers to various people's questions: (...) Yes, I hope we'll eventually get to what exactly the colors are... I think the 84 was colors currently in production -- it might be colors that (...) (23 years ago, 8-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
71 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
