Subject:
|
Re: TLG and "Seeding"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 28 Feb 2001 18:38:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1126 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Dave Schuler writes:
> For that matter, the alleged C-3PO and Stormtrooper kits are also
> terrible,
Ugh! I have been forced to buy them because I wanted to get the
ball-and-socket joint where the ball has an axle hole instead of a
throwbot/bionicle leg attached to it. I was complaining loudly about how
foetid the sets were and how I felt bad because every copy of the sets I bought
was sending a message to TLC that the set was good- and one of my friends
suggested that I take out the ball and sockets, box the rest up and mail it to
TLC with a note explaining that I hate the set SO MUCH, and find it SO
OFFENSIVE, that they can have the rest of it back.
To this day I am seriously considering that course of action.
eric
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: TLG and "Seeding"
|
| (...) In this discussion the Star Wars sets have been generally regarded as exceptions to the rule. Your 673 example is more on target but still overlooks the dreadful state of design in more recent Lego sets. Compare, for example, set (URL) from (...) (23 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
|
81 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
