Subject:
|
Re: Connect Four game issues
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 18:49:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
535 times
|
| |
|
|
> It would be really good if the action of toggling the timer could
> be used to signal the other bot to begin his move.
>
> They don;t need to be the same electrical point, but if we're closing
> a switch for the control lab, why not another one for the other bot?
>
> That way you could have a human and a bot each playing against the clock!
>
> Or for that matter, two humans....
Well if we make the interface modular enough, we could have a human
module and a robot module that plugs into the timer block. The human
module could provide a button a person could press to say they have
finished their turn. If two people wanted to play, then you plug a
human module into each side of the timer block.
Derek
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Connect Four game issues
|
| (...) Two human modules. Cute :) That's what I figured- a human module is a giant "slapper" wired to a touch switch. I prefer not to use a ControlLab for the arbiter. I agree with Steve-an RCX, or better yet, a Scout. (Two inputs, two outputs, and (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | RE: Connect Four game issues
|
| (...) Nice explanation Derek! It would be really good if the action of toggling the timer could be used to signal the other bot to begin his move. They don;t need to be the same electrical point, but if we're closing a switch for the control lab, (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
72 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
