Subject:
|
Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 27 Jan 2001 00:55:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
818 times
|
| |
|
|
> ...but I
> concede that it is possible that a malicious god could have set things up
> (faked the data) to make macroevolution seem likely while actually having
> done things completely differently.
>
> Highly unlikely, but possible. Any god who would do that to his creations
> isn't worthy of my worship, but I digress.
I have to admit, I find this a rather curious point. I know of no religion
where there god must prove its/his/her self worthy of the worship of the
individual. Further, I believe that if an entity, whatever it is, were able
to create the whole substance of my reality without me knowing - I think it
would also command my respect.
In short, if god does exist, we exist because it/she/he does – not in spite
of his/her/its existence. Is that an irrefutable point?
Scott A
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
78 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
