Subject:
|
Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Jan 2001 23:30:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1678 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jon Kozan writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jon Kozan writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> >
> > > > I agree. There is virtually no debate in science on whether there is
> > > > evolution (including macro-evolution). The particulars, yes.
> > > >
> > > > Bruce
> > >
> > > Hardly - but that shows you just how easliy you've bought into the theory.
> > > If my statement isn't sufficient for you, please write one, and I'll address
> > > it. Please be concise.
> > >
> > > -Jon
> >
> > You keep making these claims, but I have seen no evidence of such (debate
> > within science on if evolution happens). You are welcome to submit such
> > (gotta be accredited scientists in scientific journals - spare me the
> > religious crackpots). You, for example, might credibly argue that evolution
> > violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics (a popular argument amongst
> > creationists), since you are a physicist (but be careful, I'm surrounded by
> > Cal Tech and MIT grads with doctorates in physics). Get it published and
> > let's see what the scientific world does with it.
> >
> > Bruce
>
> I don't for an instant imagine that you won't attack what I say, but that's • not
> the point with my opening post. Nor have I attempted to cite any evidence yet
> one way or the other.
>
> All I'm trying to do is state the tenants of macro evolution as it applies to
> the fossil record. If you don't like my summary of it, then please submit • your
> own and we can go from there.
>
> Stick to the subject please.
>
> -Jon
In other words, you can't back up your claims. You only want to stick to the
subject if you get the last word ("Hardly - which wasn't on topic, but I wanted
to have a zinger without a rejoinder"). Don't lecture me on what you can't do
yourself. If you had said my comment originl comment was off-topic without a
rejoinder, you might have had a leg to stand on.
Bruce
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!"
|
| (...) No Bruce - give me a break - if you can't establish the basis for a discussion there is no discussion. I'll be glad to backup my claims when I make them. For the 4th time - Do you accept my statements as descriptive of the key questions of the (...) (26 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!"
|
| (...) I don't for an instant imagine that you won't attack what I say, but that's not the point with my opening post. Nor have I attempted to cite any evidence yet one way or the other. All I'm trying to do is state the tenants of macro evolution as (...) (26 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
78 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
