Subject:
|
Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 23 Jan 2001 00:15:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
537 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jon Kozan writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jon Kozan writes:
> > > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> > >
> > > > > I agree. There is virtually no debate in science on whether there is
> > > > > evolution (including macro-evolution). The particulars, yes.
> > > > >
> > > > > Bruce
> > > >
> > > > Hardly - but that shows you just how easliy you've bought into the theory.
> > > > If my statement isn't sufficient for you, please write one, and I'll
> > > > address
> > > > it. Please be concise.
> > > >
> > > > -Jon
> > >
> > > You keep making these claims, but I have seen no evidence of such (debate
> > > within science on if evolution happens). You are welcome to submit such
> > > (gotta be accredited scientists in scientific journals - spare me the
> > > religious crackpots). You, for example, might credibly argue that evolution
> > > violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics (a popular argument amongst
> > > creationists), since you are a physicist (but be careful, I'm surrounded by
> > > Cal Tech and MIT grads with doctorates in physics). Get it published and
> > > let's see what the scientific world does with it.
> > >
> > > Bruce
> >
> > I don't for an instant imagine that you won't attack what I say, but that's
> > not
> > the point with my opening post. Nor have I attempted to cite any evidence
> > yet
> > one way or the other.
> >
> > All I'm trying to do is state the tenants of macro evolution as it applies to
> > the fossil record. If you don't like my summary of it, then please submit
> > your
> > own and we can go from there.
> >
> > Stick to the subject please.
> >
> > -Jon
>
> In other words, you can't back up your claims. You only want to stick to the
> subject if you get the last word ("Hardly - which wasn't on topic, but I
> wanted
> to have a zinger without a rejoinder"). Don't lecture me on what you can't do
> yourself. If you had said my comment originl comment was off-topic without a
> rejoinder, you might have had a leg to stand on.
No Bruce - give me a break - if you can't establish the basis for a discussion
there is no discussion.
I'll be glad to backup my claims when I make them.
For the 4th time -
Do you accept my statements as descriptive of the key questions of the fossil
record as it relates to macro evolution?
If you don't, concisely write your own.
-Jon
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!"
|
| (...) Just following *your* lead. (...) You've been challenged on your extravagant claims of support or lack of support for either side many times by many people and have never offered any shred of proof. You'll continue to dodge the question. (...) (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!"
|
| (...) not (...) your (...) In other words, you can't back up your claims. You only want to stick to the subject if you get the last word ("Hardly - which wasn't on topic, but I wanted to have a zinger without a rejoinder"). Don't lecture me on what (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
78 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
