Subject:
|
Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Jan 2001 22:38:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
472 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jon Kozan writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> > I agree. There is virtually no debate in science on whether there is
> > evolution (including macro-evolution). The particulars, yes.
> >
> > Bruce
>
> Hardly - but that shows you just how easliy you've bought into the theory.
> If my statement isn't sufficient for you, please write one, and I'll address
> it. Please be concise.
>
> -Jon
You keep making these claims, but I have seen no evidence of such (debate
within science on if evolution happens). You are welcome to submit such
(gotta be accredited scientists in scientific journals - spare me the
religious crackpots). You, for example, might credibly argue that evolution
violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics (a popular argument amongst
creationists), since you are a physicist (but be careful, I'm surrounded by
Cal Tech and MIT grads with doctorates in physics). Get it published and
let's see what the scientific world does with it.
Bruce
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!"
|
| (...) I don't for an instant imagine that you won't attack what I say, but that's not the point with my opening post. Nor have I attempted to cite any evidence yet one way or the other. All I'm trying to do is state the tenants of macro evolution as (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
78 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
