Subject:
|
Re: Macro-Evolution - Impossible!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 25 Jan 2001 21:44:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
561 times
|
| |
|
|
> In other words, evidence from the fossil record can't prove or disprove
> evolution. But since it can produce testable hypotheses, evolution is a more
> powerful explanation of what we observe in the fossil record than creation
> "science" is.
IANAP either, however:
http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-c006.html
--
-TiM
NB, CA
http://echofx.itgo.com
t_c_c@yahoo.com
3ch0fx
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Macro-Evolution - Impossible!
|
| (...) and what little does is some 40 years old--the palaeontological equivalent of considering an IBM PC-XT "cutting edge" in 2001, just because it's only a dozen or so years old. It's selective misinformation--Kitts's work is even older, mostly in (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Macro-Evolution - Impossible!
|
| (...) IANAP (I am not a paleontologist), but I'm not sure that the fossil record shows either of these things. It shows the spatial and historical pattern of life on earth (what lived where, when), but we can only infer the evolutionary process from (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
78 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
