To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 8982
8981  |  8983
Subject: 
Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 00:23:53 GMT
Viewed: 
667 times
  
Looks like Tims' running strongly - I may just need to sit back and watch.
-Jon

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tim Culberson writes:

Dave Schuler wrote:

  Yes, thank you Tim, since you answered a question that Jon has ducked
through dozens of posts in several debates and threads thereof.
  And thank you for providing some references, so that those of us who
support evolution are at last able to address some of the foundation points
of creationist belief, rather than quibbling with a single debater about
minutiae.
  Finally, before anyone sets out at refuting the claims made by your
references, it should be pointed out yet again that "Creation Science" is
not science, for reasons that Jon the Physicist refuses to accept but which
nonetheless remain true.

     Dave!

Again I apologize if I'm re-hashing what has already been discussed due
to my not following these discussions from the beginning but I assume by
saying that (and I do agree with that statement) I can also state with
the same implications that "Evolution" (in terms of the origins of earth
and all living things) is also NOT science, but rather a theory.  If you
DO in fact disagree with this please please please hurry back to my
previously cited website http://www.drdino.com and collect your $250,
000 (that's a heck of a lot of LEGO!).

Quote

Evolution is positively anti-science. Science deals with things • that
                 are testable, observable, and demonstrable and
evolution has
                 none of those qualities. To call evolution "science"
Is to confuse
                 fairy tales with facts. True, evolution has been mixed
with science
                 for the last thirty years, but that does not mean that
it is the same as
                 science. Beer is often advertised during sporting
events but the two
                 subjects have no logical connection, and evolution has
no more to
                 do with science than beer has to do with sports."

/Unquote (FROM http://www.drdino.com/Articles/Article6.jsp)



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
 
(...) Again I apologize if I'm re-hashing what has already been discussed due to my not following these discussions from the beginning but I assume by saying that (and I do agree with that statement) I can also state with the same implications that (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

78 Messages in This Thread:





















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR