To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 8982
8981  |  8983
Subject: 
Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 00:23:53 GMT
Viewed: 
1469 times
  
Looks like Tims' running strongly - I may just need to sit back and watch.
-Jon

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tim Culberson writes:
> 
> Dave Schuler wrote:
> 
> >   Yes, thank you Tim, since you answered a question that Jon has ducked
> > through dozens of posts in several debates and threads thereof.
> >   And thank you for providing some references, so that those of us who
> > support evolution are at last able to address some of the foundation points
> > of creationist belief, rather than quibbling with a single debater about
> > minutiae.
> >   Finally, before anyone sets out at refuting the claims made by your
> > references, it should be pointed out yet again that "Creation Science" is
> > not science, for reasons that Jon the Physicist refuses to accept but which
> > nonetheless remain true.
> > 
> >      Dave!
> 
> Again I apologize if I'm re-hashing what has already been discussed due
> to my not following these discussions from the beginning but I assume by
> saying that (and I do agree with that statement) I can also state with
> the same implications that "Evolution" (in terms of the origins of earth
> and all living things) is also NOT science, but rather a theory.  If you
> DO in fact disagree with this please please please hurry back to my
> previously cited website http://www.drdino.com and collect your $250,
> 000 (that's a heck of a lot of LEGO!).
> 
> > Quote
> 
>  Evolution is positively anti-science. Science deals with things • that
>                  are testable, observable, and demonstrable and
> evolution has
>                  none of those qualities. To call evolution "science"
> Is to confuse
>                  fairy tales with facts. True, evolution has been mixed
> with science
>                  for the last thirty years, but that does not mean that
> it is the same as
>                  science. Beer is often advertised during sporting
> events but the two
>                  subjects have no logical connection, and evolution has
> no more to
>                  do with science than beer has to do with sports."
> 
> > /Unquote (FROM http://www.drdino.com/Articles/Article6.jsp)



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
 
(...) Again I apologize if I'm re-hashing what has already been discussed due to my not following these discussions from the beginning but I assume by saying that (and I do agree with that statement) I can also state with the same implications that (...) (26 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

78 Messages in This Thread:





















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR