Subject:
|
Re: Why not Both?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 00:16:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
356 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jon Kozan writes:
>
> > Science admidts to progressively understand things, and when new
> > evidence is presented it changes it's theory on that matter. Supposed
> > disagreements are only due to a lack of data on science's part. The Bible,
> > however, does not claim to re-interpret itself. It's the "God is infinite"
> > point again - He doesn't need to since He was accurate in the first place.
>
> Here you've spelled out very nicely why science is not a religion, and
> religion is not a science. Thank you.
>
> > Unfortuantely, our nihilistic, relative society has convinced itself that
> > there is nothing sure, that all is relative. That bias has blinded many to
> > the fact that there is a God who is sure and absolute, and whom we can trust
> > absolutely.
>
> Is that Odin? Brahma? Zoroaster? Allah? Yahweh? Who? And why? This
> question has been asked countless times, and no one here (or anywhere,
> really) has answered it. Once again, as in previous threads, you're throwing
> around the "blind" insult in an apparent attempt to browbeat the heathen
> into acceptance.
>
> > Not all knowledge is relatively, interpretively, progressively learned.
>
> Interesting. You're describing satori, the condition of understanding
> as-a-whole, without acquiring of awareness step by step. A very solid goal
> of Zen Buddhism.
If you want to create a Christianity vs other religions discussion we could do
that. Not sufficient time for me. Here too - I'm merely stating the literal
biblical interpretation. I'm not comparing / contrasting it with other
religions, I'll leave that for a later debate or someone else.
Not that I couldn't - I just don't have the time.
-Jon
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Why not Both?
|
| (...) Here you've spelled out very nicely why science is not a religion, and religion is not a science. Thank you. (...) Is that Odin? Brahma? Zoroaster? Allah? Yahweh? Who? And why? This question has been asked countless times, and no one here (or (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
88 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
