To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 9062
9061  |  9063
Subject: 
Re: Why not Both?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 25 Jan 2001 23:14:37 GMT
Viewed: 
2087 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jon Kozan writes:

> > > > I'll second that question-- why pick the Bible? Why pick Jesus? Why pick
> > > > your (Jon's) particular sect of Christianity? I'm going to argue that you
> > > > (Jon) pride yourself on your ability to judge correctly in the matter, and
> > > > unless you're willing to admit that you MAY be wrong, I won't let you get
> > > > away very easily.
> > > 
> > > No claims on perfection here.
> > > Although the 'sect' comment was a bit divisive.
> > 
> > Is that any kind of answer to the question at hand? Namely, why pick
> > Christianity over any other faith?

> I was only answering the "willingness to admit that I MAY be wrong."
> Not the other - although I can provide one to that too.

  Okay, let's hear it (or is this another one of those
I-can-answer-but-won't situations?)

   Dave!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Why not Both?
 
(...) You're being silly (or - more likely - provocative) I've posted my answer. -Jon (26 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Why not Both?
 
(...) I was only answering the "willingness to admit that I MAY be wrong." Not the other - although I can provide one to that too. -Jon (26 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

88 Messages in This Thread:




























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR