To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 8917
8916  |  8918
Subject: 
Re: Why not Both?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 23 Jan 2001 17:07:47 GMT
Viewed: 
273 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jon Kozan writes:

I should point out that this perspective has already been advanced many times
and has been debunked and pretty much rejected. While it is intellectually
stimulating, it misses the scientific evidence for creation that is indeed
consistant with the Biblical account - a literal 7-day creation.

  All right.  Once again it is apparent that your notion of scientific
validity has little reference to the reality of modern scientific thinking.

And I'll be glad to being to address the flaws in the evolutionary theory in
my other threads.

  Am I reading you right? You're saying that its fine for you to start
threads and then refuse to answer questions except those in line with your
choice du jour, but when anyone tries to pin you down for specifics, or to
start a specific thread to address certain issues, you say "read my other
thread."  Ridiculous.  And, I hasten to point out, you have not (nor has
anyone else in modern history) provided ANY SOLID EVIDENCE WHATOSOEVER that
biblical creation happened.

     Dave!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Why not Both?
 
(...) Dave - don't get upset - I just thought that your posting was about joining the 2 lines of thought together. That has been considered already. My point is precisely that. I'm not attempting to debunk it here... Is that what you want? I just (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Why not Both?
 
(...) I should point out that this perspective has already been advanced many times and has been debunked and pretty much rejected. While it is intellectually stimulating, it misses the scientific evidence for creation that is indeed consistant with (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

88 Messages in This Thread:




























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR