Subject:
|
Re: Why not Both?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 26 Jan 2001 15:37:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
396 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jon Kozan writes:
> I believe, given my time limits, it's far easier to adopt Tim's methodology -
> cite a concise preexisting answer.
>
> Why is Christianity supreme? - Why is it different?
> http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-r003.html
For those not interested in slogging through another page of Christian
rhetoric (ie: propaganda), this page states in essence that Christianity
(the religion that worships Christ) is the greatest religion because it
worships Christ.
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Why not Both?
|
| (...) Thanks for summarizing, Dave!. I find Jon and Tim's references hard slogging for the most part, since they're obviously written for uncritical thinkers. They tend to be a tough read for anyone else. Of course, I personally have to disagree (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Why not Both?
|
| (...) I believe, given my time limits, it's far easier to adopt Tim's methodology - cite a concise preexisting answer. Why is Christianity supreme? - Why is it different? (URL) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
88 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
