Subject:
|
Re: Why not Both?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 25 Jan 2001 23:33:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
477 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jon Kozan writes:
>
> > > > > I'll second that question-- why pick the Bible? Why pick Jesus? Why pick
> > > > > your (Jon's) particular sect of Christianity? I'm going to argue that you
> > > > > (Jon) pride yourself on your ability to judge correctly in the matter, and
> > > > > unless you're willing to admit that you MAY be wrong, I won't let you get
> > > > > away very easily.
> > > >
> > > > No claims on perfection here.
> > > > Although the 'sect' comment was a bit divisive.
> > >
> > > Is that any kind of answer to the question at hand? Namely, why pick
> > > Christianity over any other faith?
>
> > I was only answering the "willingness to admit that I MAY be wrong."
> > Not the other - although I can provide one to that too.
>
> Okay, let's hear it (or is this another one of those
> I-can-answer-but-won't situations?)
You're being silly (or - more likely - provocative) I've posted my answer.
-Jon
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Why not Both?
|
| (...) Since Jon is manifestly unable to answer a question when asked of him, can someone else (preferably a critical thinker) among us point to the post in which Jon allegedly provided the answer? Or any answer, really? Dave! (23 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
88 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
