To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 8947
8946  |  8948
Subject: 
Re: Why not Both?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 23 Jan 2001 20:41:00 GMT
Viewed: 
446 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jon Kozan writes:

This is why I'm trying so hard to get to starting definitions in the other
threads.

In addition, have you presented your own starting definitions?

http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=8915

  Thank you for the pointer.  I will address this question in particular:

REVISED:
1) Do strata (layers of sediment) support a progressive, over millennia,
approach which reveals the progression (simple forms leading to more
complicated forms) of life through time? Or is there a better explanation
(hypothesis) which fits the evidence?

later this evening or tomorrow, because I have to consult a text at home.

    Dave!



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Why not Both?
 
(...) Yes: (URL) revised again in: (URL) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

88 Messages in This Thread:




























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR