Subject:
|
Re: Why not Both?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 20:31:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
443 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jon Kozan writes:
> > I'll second that question-- why pick the Bible? Why pick Jesus? Why pick
> > your (Jon's) particular sect of Christianity? I'm going to argue that you
> > (Jon) pride yourself on your ability to judge correctly in the matter, and
> > unless you're willing to admit that you MAY be wrong, I won't let you get
> > away very easily.
>
> No claims on perfection here.
Excellent! No further qualms then :)
(at least at this level)
> Although the 'sect' comment was a bit divisive.
Oh? How so? I don't see it any less divisive than any other choices I might
have offered... Unless you think it my purpose to pick apart Christianity
thanks to its diversity, which I'm not after...
DaveE
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Why not Both?
|
| (...) Good - an easy one! "Sect" I usally take to mean a small, off-the-beaten-path branch of something greater. Although that may not have been your intention, I _did_ only say 'a bit.' My branch of Christianity is actually pretty mainstream - I (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
88 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
