To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 9086
9085  |  9087
Subject: 
Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 26 Jan 2001 07:29:51 GMT
Viewed: 
2219 times
  
Tim Culberson wrote:

> Guy Albertelli wrote:
> 
> > Schoolbooks due suffer from a variety of errors. This however is not
> > because Darwinian Evolution is wrong, but rather because the people writing
> > the books are more interested in selling them then getting their facts
> > right.
> 
> So how can one say that issuing a misleading textbook without pointing
> out the BLATANT errors isn't misleading the student?

Sounds like the Bible to me.  Pot - kettle - black.



> > Kids are generally not good scientists, and can only see things in black
> > and white. So we give the best start we can along the best guess we have by
> > presenting it as the TRUTH, and hope that they will also devlop some
> > critical thinking skills along the way so can accept new good data, reject
> > bad data, and be able to create new hypotheses, and test them on their own.
> 
> So then you wouldn't have a problem if I were teaching your child to
> issue a Bible to each student in my class and teach them about Creation
> from the Genesis record?

In the US?  Damned straight I would - Separation of Church and State, remember?
Now, if it were a PRIVATE school, more power to you.  But if a public school that
gets MY tax money, that Bible had better stay out of it.



>  I'll give them the best start I can along with
> the best guess I have by presenting it as the TRUTH, and hope that they
> will also develop some critical thinking skills along the way so they
> can accept new good data, reject bad data, and be able to create new
> hypotheses, and test them on their own.

You should follow your own ideals - how you could possibly believe the Earth is
6K years old after using the above skills, I can't imagine.

--
Tom Stangl
***http://www.vfaq.com/
***DSM Visual FAQ home
***http://ba.dsm.org/
***SF Bay Area DSMs



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
 
(...) So how can one say that issuing a misleading textbook without pointing out the BLATANT errors isn't misleading the student? (...) There are a heck of a lot less evidences to discredit the above theories compared to Evolution. (here's 20 to (...) (26 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

78 Messages in This Thread:





















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR